I don't really have a thumb on British politics, but I think I can safely say most American commentators were a little surprised by this move.
Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling gave a pre-budget report to Parliament yesterday in London. During the speech he announced a one-time 50% tax on bonuses paid in the banking sector that are the equivalent of $40,700 and over. All banks are affected: whether they accepted British government funds or not, and whether they are British or not. If you're a bank with an office in London, you're British employees are paying this tax.
I am not going to conjecture as to the impetus behind this policy; plenty of other commentators are. Rationales include: trying to close Britain's deficit, recouping some of the money spent to buttress the British financial system, or perhaps a political gesture for the large bonuses that are anticipated to be cut at year's end (and the subsequent populist fall-out). I haven't, however, read too many commentators opining this is an adept method to curb banker risk-taking, which I thought was the universally identified boogey-man for the economic crisis ...
It's being reported everywhere, including at Bloomberg, theNYTimes, and the WSJ.
Tweet this!
Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling gave a pre-budget report to Parliament yesterday in London. During the speech he announced a one-time 50% tax on bonuses paid in the banking sector that are the equivalent of $40,700 and over. All banks are affected: whether they accepted British government funds or not, and whether they are British or not. If you're a bank with an office in London, you're British employees are paying this tax.
I am not going to conjecture as to the impetus behind this policy; plenty of other commentators are. Rationales include: trying to close Britain's deficit, recouping some of the money spent to buttress the British financial system, or perhaps a political gesture for the large bonuses that are anticipated to be cut at year's end (and the subsequent populist fall-out). I haven't, however, read too many commentators opining this is an adept method to curb banker risk-taking, which I thought was the universally identified boogey-man for the economic crisis ...
It's being reported everywhere, including at Bloomberg, theNYTimes, and the WSJ.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Discussion and feedback is encouraged, but civility and professionalism will be maintained by administrative censoring of abusive or off-topic comments. Thank you.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.